Not sure what I’m doing wrong that this happens like every time for a 10-15 degree tilt.
I never use auto exposure unless the software object is made from 2 different materials like darker or lighter , if you have one material and it is bright like white or gray , use 1 and maximum 2 for gray color surface .
1 Like
I use 3D spray .. I don’t use foot spray especially for so small objects , you would have bad results and clumpy surfaces .
For Auto mode and Full Field you need it to be matte surface and preferable 3D spray .
1 Like
No problem I am here for you if you need anything ….
Thanks, I haven’t been using auto exposure and been roughly following what you said. Is my best option for getting the underside of an object like this to just do a separate scan and merge? I just can’t seem to get a good merge without causing a bunch of surface roughness etc. I’d love to find a way to do the whole object in a single scan. But I just can’t get the under side on most models.
I’ve been sticking to auto turntable mode. But I just need a better workflow process here.
From what I see from your preview , things don’t look ok .. something is odd
Can you please scan for me some simple object , like one rotation capture , then fuse it at the best level and show me the result ?
Sure let me just finish this scan up. I am doing one at center height, and then doing each new rotation by manually placing the angle on the turntable, moving the scanner, then starting the auto turntable with the programmed angle after confirming its appropriately distanced/focused and that works. But any sort of automation kind of messes it all up
1 Like
How large of an object? Or should I keep in smaller given what I’m scanning
The scan looks ok thank you , the angle little too low , it suppose to be at 45 degrees to the main object and capture the top and sides without issues .
However I wanted to see the quality of the capture , so seeing from the sides it looks ok even with so symmetrical object .
You should have no issues capturing the other .
Can you capture just the printed model without the object of interest and making sure it is at 45 degrees so the top is captured well using the Auto mode ?
Use the smaller version you printed and fuse after scanning .
I was just hoping if I went more mid, I could catch under and above easily with tilt and get a complete model
Edit: Oops that isn’t auto mode
If you used manual fusing , this is not good quality , you will have huge issue to capture smaller objects .
Now the question reminds, is that calibration issue or the scanner .
I would suggest you re calibrate the scanner and scan again , if you don’t get crispy results you will need to make appointment with customer@revopoint3d.com and check in the hardware .
You can include the link to this thread as reference.
Hopefully it is just a calibration issue …
I did use manual fusing
It told me it passed accuracy, but I recalibrated it anyway. Is it possible using the lightbox is causing an issue?
Did you rescan again after calibration ?
To tell you the truth , your scan looks like it have a very low accuracy . That’s not normal .
What about it is really off? It’s kind of capturing the layer lines and other standard 3d print stuff. Obviously the middle is just occluded because I’m doing a single pass in a circle like you said
Ah ok , it looks better now , after you showed me the original .
I can see the printing layers .
I am signing off for today is almost midnight here , will catch up tomorrow.
In main time please practice
Have a good night!
1 Like
Despite being one of the main features, I never use the tilt of the turntable. If you think about where the pivot point is, the further you tilt and the taller your object the greater the change in distance from the scanner, not just the angle you are looking at it.
1 Like