I couldn’t figure out how to link it, so here is a copy of the my post and your reply:
1bigpig
PUTV
Apr 5
@PUTV can you think of a situation in 3d scanning that 0.015 would make difference over scanning at 0.02mm? I think companies chase specs with little improvement in the output/outcome. For example, going from 1920x1080 to 4K resolution made a huge difference. Going to 8k–especially on a desktop size screen, makes little to no sense.
I wish that Revopoint spend their R&D on building the Miraco MetroY (or whatever they are gonna call their stand-alone laser scanner) instead of doing the MetroXPro. I think all the MetroXPro did was dilute and confuse the market with their MetroY line. All the while, the company on the other side of Shenzhen made a stand-alone laser scanner. I am hoping that Revopoint releases their Miraco laser scanner soon. I guess the part that drives me crazy is that 1. Revopoint was first to the consumer market with a stand alone 2. the other scanner has been known about for about 6 months and been for sale for 3. It is not like some new territory or a unknown market for Revopoint. It is THEIR market to lose. It is a slam-dunk product for Revopoint, but they are letting someone else do it. Why?
Instead, we got Metro Y Ultra with 0.005 extra resolution and no stand alone laser scanner. Yea, I am a little disappointed.
Bruce
post by PUTV on Apr 5
PUTV REVOPOINT3D
Apr 5
Hi Bruce,
I hope you are doing well.
To follow up on our discussion regarding scanner precision, it is important to note that a smaller accuracy rating leads to significantly more precise corners and details. The difference between 0.015 mm and 0.02 mm is actually quite substantial in practice.
Typically, this level of detail is not achievable with handheld scanners, as they require a completely still environment free of any vibrations to function effectively at that resolution. Generally, this level of precision is only seen in stationary systems, such as the Artec Micro, which remain unmovable to achieve such results. Furthermore, because this level of accuracy produces very large file sizes, it is typically reserved for scanning very small objects.
I look forward to sharing more specific technical specifications and results during my showcase next week.
Regarding the future of 3D scanning technology I wanted to share some detailed thoughts on the technical challenges .
Current Android systems lack the significant computing power required for this level of technology, making a near-term implementation unlikely. Attempting to integrate high-performance components like CUDA GPUs or heavy-duty CPUs presents major hurdles in terms of power consumption and thermal management.
Effectively, we would be trying to fit the power of a laptop into a scanner-sized enclosure, which would likely result in less than 30 minutes of runtime and a price point that is prohibitive for the average consumer.
For a 3D laser scanner to be effective, it needs a high density of laser lines and a high frame rate, ideally around 80 fps. To make such a device truly wireless and portable, we would need a substantial power source. However, current battery limitations mean these devices would be difficult to ship via air or take on a plane, and a 30-minute operational window is simply not practical for professional use.
While I believe we may have reached the maximum accuracy possible for the MetroY series and handheld scanners in general, I am very interested in exploring different technologies. I would love to see more development in LIDAR or commercial-grade solutions similar to the drone-mounted scanners Revopoint produced previously for building inspections.
Anyway thank you for your feedback , I look forward to hearing your thoughts on where w
Rebopoint should focus their hardware improvements next.
Happy Holiday’s & Happy Easter everyone , I am off to celebrate. See you on Monday !
