I do agree with you Tom , but most people I told that they need to use 802.11ac they had no idea what it means.
2.4Ghz or 5Ghz is the most used term that most people understand.
The standard has been retroactively labelled as Generation Wi-Fi 5 .
I do agree with you Tom , but most people I told that they need to use 802.11ac they had no idea what it means.
2.4Ghz or 5Ghz is the most used term that most people understand.
The standard has been retroactively labelled as Generation Wi-Fi 5 .
Exactly, IF the spec said ‘5GHz’ that would have been sufficient, but it said ‘5 G’ which is too ambiguous.
I tried to get my Mini to join my WiFi list night. I got it connected but Revoscan never sees it.
I’m guessing it’s because my main PC is on a different (routable) subnet to my WiFi stuff.
It would be good if in Revoscan we could just chuck an IP address in there for the scanner and just have it connect.
Yep.
There is no sophisticated discovery protocol in place, RevoScan simply sends the text “{intent:0}” to all stations in local subnet on UDP port 8080. The device responds with a package that also looks JSONish:
{"intent":0, "equip_id":"{redacted}", "ip":"10.2.20.129", "firmware":"v2.8.33.20220903", "algo":"v7.6.9.0816"}
It also seems to scan 192.168.3.64/26 and 192.168.179.1 (to router MAC without prior ARP). My router responds with “ICMP Destination unreachable”. Not sure what this is for?
Thanks, will check this within the next days …
Totally agree with you , I wonder who translated this specifications .
Certainly not me. The primary translation group hasn’t been given anything to do for months. We were pinged for availability last month, but no work.
I would not expect that from you … I found couple more stuff around wondering if anybody else did that or not at all .