How to quickly master MetroX's scanning: an experience of professional Cultural Heritage conservator - dfodaro

Let me introduce myself for those who don’t know me.
I am a professional italian conservator-restorer of cultural heritage. I have forty years of experience in this field. In the last decade I have also been involved in the applications of 3D technologies in my work, using 3D scanners, 3D printers and related software. I am not and do not consider myself a professional 3D technician, but a user of 3D technologies for professional purposes. I have always been a supporter of the “democratization of technologies” (even sophisticated ones) and in my experience I have used several scanners of various brands and of various costs. Revopoint scanners have contributed in an essential way to a turning point for the “democratization” of 3D scanners. I have had the opportunity to use practically all Revopoint scanners, which have become tools of almost daily use in my professional activity. That said, tools of this level at a reasonable cost, always remain tools that must be used with discernment and that require conscious use, (self) training, many tests and much work. As I often say, making a comparison with artistic activity, if it were enough to have Michelangelo’s chisel to sculpt in the same way, the world would be full of great artists!
As I wrote, I do not consider myself a professional 3D technician and for this reason my approach is always very humble: I do not think that the tool (in this case the 3D scanner) is ineffective or inadequate, but, on the contrary, I think that I am doing something wrong.
That said, I would like to make a small contribution by describing my approach to scanning, using a scanner as sophisticated and powerful as MetroX.
I’ll start by saying that my “subjects” are works of art and this in itself means that for 3D scanning the approach and techniques to be used are often inapplicable. For example, the use of 3D spray on artistic surfaces is almost never allowed, as is the need to glue 3D markers on the surfaces. In short, what should facilitate, help 3D scanning cannot be used. It’s true, there are now products (3D spray) made specifically for delicate surfaces such as artistic ones, but often, having to ask for permission to apply these opacifying layers, those who have to authorize it do not authorize it (and I speak from personal experience).
On the other hand, speaking of 3D markers to be pasted directly on surfaces, the problem of authorization does not even arise: the thing is prohibited!
So the use of a 3D scanner such as the MetroX, already poses challenges on how to use it effectively on subjects such as artworks.

I show you below the example of a sculpture, which in itself is a challenge to make a quality 3D scan.

The sculpture has fine details, undercut, dark colour, shining surface. In sum, this is a challenge to evaluate how far the potential of the MetroX scanner can be pushed. Furthermore, I have decided not to treat the surface to “facilitate” scanning.
Scanning a bronze sculpture with a dark patina is a challenge for those who need to create a quality 3D model with high detail.
MetroX in the Cross Lines laser scan mode allowed me to carry out the scan and the Marker Block Kit was essential to avoid placing the markers directly on the surface of the sculpture.
Truly amazing result.
The scanning set, in the images below:
the scuplture is all surrounded from many marker blocks.

After setting the parameters (Laser Brightness, Depth Exposure) I started to pass the scanner in a smooth and continuous motion, trying to stay with a constant distance and also an even speed.

During scanning, it is critical to keep enough markers in the scanning field (which is why there are so many of them placed around the sculpture).

The scan preview window is of great use, with the visual aid of color, color changing as the scanner acquires points, we know that when it turns all green the number of points is optimal and covers the entire surface.

Scanning took only a few minutes (about seven).

The next stage was point fusion.

…and after removing unnecessary points on the outside of the sculpture
then meshing.

These two operations also took a few minutes.

The result is amazing!
I have scanned this sculpture with other scanners and never achieved (and so simply) a result as rich in detail as with MetroX.

The advice is: don’t lose heart and be willing to try, test and still spend a lot of time to be able to understand and get better and better results until you reach excellence.

…To be continued…

8 Likes

Many thanks for this very interesting information. You may have seen on this forum a recent thread I started on scanning the top and bottom of pieces and also, in my case, not being able to stick markers on the object. I am also involved in scanning some museum artifacts. In your sculpture, I assume you will simple add an artificial flat base to the model in post process? Is that generally acceptable in the conservation world? What might your approach be if there were, for example important engravings or writing on the bottom?

Many thanks,

David

1 Like

So true!

Thanks for sharing your use.

MetroX is a tool and there is some skill to using it and the software. With each scan I do I am revising and refining my methods for scanning and each time my results gets better and better. The tool works, but does need a skilled craftsman to use it. :slight_smile:

2 Likes

Hi David,

Thank you for your interest and appreciation.

Below is an example of a scan of a complete sculpture (without a base), solved by scanning it in two parts (front and back) and merging them later in Revoscan.

Child Bacchus head - bronze

Scanning mode: handHeld scan, Parallel Lines, Marker pad

I taked two scans (back and front) and after editing merged the final model

RevoScan - front

RevoScan - back

RevoScan - merging

RevoScan - final model

Meshlab

PS I used a modified version by me of the marker pad: I glued at the printed markers on the pad the markers (which are more reflective) from the Marker Block Kit.

5 Likes

Interesting that you did a manual alignment and not feature align. The back and front look at though they would have enough features to align. I have found that manual alignment isn’t very accurate.

Did you use the marker pad because you couldn’t track the model while scanning? again, it looks as though feature mode would work fine. Or were you using the metroX scanner and this needs markers??

1 Like

Hi David,
Actually the overlap areas were pretty uniform as morphology and that’s why I did the manual alignment, which as you can see worked well.
Regarding the use of the MetroX laser mode (parallel lines) in this case, my approach is, when I have a new tool, to do some testing to see how to get the result and what level of result can I achieve.

Nice job! Have you used the Miraco scanner? Would you choose the MetroX over that one for this type of work? Does the laser scanning on the MetroX give you better and more versatile results?
Cheers,

David

Hi David,
I also have the Miraco Plus but the two tools are completely different in design, usability and technologies and you cannot compare them.

I can tell you that compared to MetroX it can be complementary, not a replacement.

Well that’s good news as I have just ordered a MetroX to go alongside my Miraco - I must be mad…

1 Like

Well done!

I might be asking you a few questions once it arrives if you don’t mind? Especially about conservation scanning.

Cheers,

David

Sure, I’m available to help you

One of the most interesting and useful accessories produced by Revopoint is the turntable. This tool allows you to automate scanning considering that it interfaces directly with Revoscan.
Let me show you the result of a not at all simple scan, an ancient polychrome vase. With MetroX I was able to acquire the entire object with a truly amazing surface quality (look at the snapshots of the object without the color texture) and also the very rich polychrome decoration.

Ancient Chinese Canton-style vase (10 cm high)
Another smooth scan with color

Scanning mode: Auto Turntable - color
All automatic scan with only 72 frames with MetroX

Summary video

Raw

Fused

Meshed

Textured

Final result

The vase’s fine surface morpholgy in Meshlab
The thin layer of the decoration paint is perfectly recorded by the 3D scan

6 Likes

Saluti dalla Grecia!
Yani here, professional architect, often dealing with restoration works of monuments. I have been using other Revopoint products as well (Mini and Range) and Metro X is a great improvement.
Have you guys ever tried Metro X with larger “cultural heritage” objects, let’s say over 1m long?
In my experience, MetroX does a great job with small objects, especially when small enough to fit in a turntable.
With large objects where it is not allowed to stick markers (such as ancient marble architectural elements) I’ve had a very hard time and a frustrating experience…
When the object is not “feature rich” in its entire surface, losing track is almost always the case and it is impossible to make a complete scan. Scanning in small parts and then merge sometimes works, othertimes there are geometrical discrepancies between the parts and I cannot get an accurate 3D model.
What I found to make some difference is to keep the scanner at an angle and not directly perpendicular to the object. This way, part of points are far, part of them close, but there are always some in good or excellent distance, and it is easier for the scanner to keep track.
In feature-poor objects (for instance, round marble columns without any damage or cracks) I have never succeeded to create a perfect complete model. Still trying though!
Have any of you Italian Restauro experts found some solution for such cases?
Thanks in advance!

Hi Yani,
Χαιρετισμούς από την Ιταλία!
I remember with pleasure the times I got to work in Greece; in Crete on the archaeological excavation in Gortina and in Kos in the Hellenistic quarter.

I think a 3D survey done with an architectural 3D scanner (with time-of-flight technology) should be the solution for you (but I think you already know that).
Recently, for the restoration of a chapel in a church in Venice, the 3D scan was done with a time-of-flight scanner.

Hi Davide!
I do own a lidar scanner for large architectural scenes. However, I use the revopoint scanners for details, reliefs, and whenever a 3d model needs to serve for cnc works.
Are you using the Metro X only for small objects?

For now, yes, but in the near future I will do tests on a sculptural group (5 feet tall) with MetroX using Full Field mode.

2 Likes

Many thanks for sharing that information, which I find extremely valuable! I am an archaeologist based in Greece and I joined this forum wishing to find information like that you have given. I am mostly interested in scanning small vessels, potsherds and small bronze finds, like iron pins and fibulae.

Thanks for the appreciation