I can see from the first screenshot with exposure set to 1 that is hardware issue ..
100%
They may adjust the exposure issue in next version , thatβs not an issue , but what I see is not exposure issue in your real time preview .
The strips on the real time preview cause the issue and sensor or projector related , the vertical strips on the chest area
yap in blue laser mode, only bad depth scanning.
I am going to make today comparison between the both version ( old and new) and see the difference then we can be sure what it is .
You can see my report in beta test with full project archive.
1 Like
In laser mode the strips are caused by high level of exposure and brightness of the settings and not enough of frames.
Laser technology works little different than structured light ( full Field )
In laser mode
The little strips are the individual frames , if they are hitting the surface at high settings it can create the ridges .
It is recommended to not use too high brightness or exposure when scanning very light surfaces .
I use brightness set to zero and exposure to 1 when scanning white surfaces .
Higher settings are for darker surfaces or metal .
The Full Field and Auto mode use the projector and not the laser so different way of capture , if the 2 sensors are not aligned perfectly to the projector pattern, it will create strips like on the surface .
It can be bad calibration, or even lose sensor .. happen before so everything is possible .
But donβt worry , they going to fix it for you or replace the unit , you not lose anything but the time.
1 Like
Oh yes, forgot you also testing out the new version , ok then definitely the hardware.
I will leave a note on Monday in the office to keep an eye on this . But my decision here would be replacement of the unit and I have no doubt about it.
Your results should be as fine and detailed as here in the very small scan using Auto mode
2 Likes
Blue laser mode give me a good dimension accuracy result for reverse engeneering.
On weekend good job a motor engine scan&reverse, try to report here about that.
Thank you for help 
1 Like
I tested both version and Full Field and Auto Turntable mode
exposure at 1
Fusing settings
Meshing settings according to Grid /Fusing parameters
Full Field mode result
Auto Turntable mode results
both full scans at all angles
Here is a real time preview ( may be slightly different based on a graphic card and I use GPU rendering ON )
Now you can compare to yours , as I told you , there is hardware issue , no doubt it
NOTE : Never use just single shot frame for reproducing your object, single shot frame is not 3D it is just 2D relief, Full Field usually need at least 12 to 64 single frames to capture the object, one single frame not even capture object surface fully, there are missing points so it need couple of them .
so for evaluation just run at least one rotation of your object
only one frame shot Full Field
64 single shot frames Full Field
see the difference
3 Likes
yeah cool, iβve never seen such a result on my scanner
1 Like
I know I see your posts and that is concerning , it is not software issue or user error, but hardware
I am off for the weekend, we will continue on Monday when everyone back in the office, and will be back at you.
There are always problems, and when they are solved it is great.
Laser mode works - at the moment it is enough for me to do the job.
1 Like
Laser mode ? Not bad at all .
I thought it was a metal modern horse sculpture from the thumbnail 
The blades capture is lovely on the edges
Yes cross lines, i donβt know why cross lines better scan when parallel.
Yeh big horse
we need to rest and discuss with the other participants what to do next.
p.s. I need make our software - you know scanner with open api with cross line mode ?
1 Like
Hello, any news ?
Hi Max, not yet.. the support is closed for the next 6 days, so little overloaded right now . You will get notification once I know more.
