The fluidity of the scanner is remarkable and manages to resume tracing well after each stop. Whenever I stopped scanning I ran the “complete” command to fusing the points. After that I restarted the scan.
By “stop and go” of the scan, I could only have two parts (the front and the back) which I then edited, aligned and meshed with Meshlab.
Below is the final result.
As you can see, the model is clean and virtually free of artifacts.
On the other hand, there is a certain loss of detail. The surface is a bit “flat”.
A valuable post, thank you. Do you find meshing in meshlab produces a better, final model than what Handystudio can accomplish? Specifically in the model detailed areas, such as the hair, eyes etc.
Would you be so kind as to list the specific functions used to do this? The (so-called) user manuals I have found for MeshLab reflect the fact that its programming is crowd-sourced and not cohesive.
Hi Toaster,
Thank you for appreciation
I use Meshlab, because I can make different meshes and evaluate, and choose, the result that satisfies me the most. I use “screened poisson surface reconstruction”
