Hi @luccas222 did you check here ?
yep, also in my email, also in facebook… nothing…
1 Like
I guess you get answer tomorrow , the office is closed already
1 Like
Yes, 9pm or something there… no problem. 7am in mexico right now 
1 Like
Sorry for the lack of success in sending, was previously trying to ask some questions about computer configurations to assist in reproducing the problem.
Now, the testing team has successfully reproduced the problem and is working on releasing a fix.
2 Likes
cool! tks!
1 Like
Why does 5.3 automatically combine objects when trying to merge?
It don’t do that automatic , what you see is only preview , if it don’t match , meaning the 2 scans was not proper cleaned , include parts that don’t have enough overlap areas or features resulting in mismatch in the preview .
You merging your objects based on features or manual matching points , it is like a puzzle game and things need to be precise.
Nothing is final unless you want it to be , if the preview is not satisfactory, you need to start over … clean well your scans , or set the proper matching points representing the features or use scans that have lots of own features to be matched automatic and correct .
1 Like
Started using RevoScan 5.3.0 and immediately noticed that the Window Maximize icon was not working as expected. On my system (nVidia RTX A2000 with 4k monitor), maximize actually shrinks the size of the window size but does move it to the upper left corner of the display. Clicking that icon again and the window is moved back to be centered on the display and enlarges slightly. I found the lower right corner could be pulled to enlarge the window, but I should not have to do that.
I continue to struggle with deleting small isolated triangles when there is also a larger isolated piece that I do not want deleted. I also struggle to find and select very small holes to fill on a large model. Both tools could benefit from a “Max Size” option based on number of triangles (or edges of the hole) when detecting. The 1% minimum size for isolated pieces on a large scan is usually still way too big a setting and frequently includes isolated areas I want to keep. The Hole filling tool could work if I could select “All” and then unselect large holes I do not want filled. However if a hole is just one or two triangles on a large complex scan, I find those frequently impossible to find.
What i was hoping that Revopoint do was make the isolation a selection instead.
That paired with a reverse select modify key like shift or ctrl would allow the users to deselect using lasso what the user did not want to erase or use invert selection instead
1 Like
Yes, the ability to deselect parts of what has been selected would be very useful: especially for intricate objects, where you can’t select what you want without selecting other parts as well.
This happened to me, for example, when scanning a raspberry tart: artifacts between raspberries can’t be deleted before meshing ( 3DVF.com - INSPIRE 3D Scanner showcase - #11 by shadows44 )
1 Like
Hello @X3msnake @shadows44
This feature is already being developed by the dev team and will be released in a later version of the software.
2 Likes
Could you all possibly put back the options popup for the dual axis turntable (like the Revo Scan 4 software) to have the options of doing 5 different passes with a different selectable degrees. I need the ability to do one pass, stop, move to the next angle, do one rotation etc… Seems this is missing with Revo scan 5 or am I missing something? Kind of a bummer to have to use the scan 4 software to do the automated passes and then have to export it to be worked on. I wish Revo Scan 5 had the exact turntable options as Revo scan 4.
1 Like
frame player
ability to select points then automatically highlight the corresponding frames to delete.
this will help remove the entire bad shaky frame, instead of just points.
ALSO
- lock camera view
- lock tool selection ( so it doesnt kleep snapping back to first button on frame switch
4 Likes
Hi @djsteffon
Thanks for the suggestion, I’ve sent it back to the dev team.
Hello @johnchen
Thank you, the dev team will evaluate the possibility of implementation.
Are there any plans to add a single-shot mode for mini/pop(2/3) in Revoscan?
3 Likes
Yes, make the feature usable for everyone, that would be great!
1 Like
Of course that would be amazing feature if that was available for all scans .
At this moment I can’t answer you the question , but all feedbacks and suggestions will be forwarded to our dev.team for future consideration.
Thank you for your suggestion and welcome to our community!
Catharina
1 Like
Is there a way to limit a scan to the amount of points in its point cloud?
I am trying to create a comparison between components however the scanned objects always have too many points in their point cloud.