These images are meshed from a single scan; no hole filling or merged scans.
Done in Far mode, it took about 10 minutes crawling into both sides of my car. Overall, I’d say the results are better than what I did with my Range scanner a couple years ago.
Be sure to expand the images.
Looking nice!
What were you fusing and meshing grid settings?
On my desktop computer
I fused in Advanced @ the minimum I could set, 0.59mm.
I meshed at Level 7.0, Grid Size 0.67mm.
On my nearly 8-year old laptop
Fused at minimum Advanced setting, also @ 0.59mm
Mesh Level 7.0, but the minimum was 0.73mm. I am disheartened by this difference. I realize my laptop, a Dell 7480 with a 2-core (even if hyperthreaded) i7-7600U CPU and a low-level Intel HD 620 GPU cannot compete with my desktop, but I would like to have the same settings available, even knowing that more computation time will be needed to get the same results.
