I am grateful for your tests, but I would like to see them with my own eyes. Everything is learned by comparison. please make a well-known coin
If I have time, I will test it.
2 Likes
It is scan done using laser mode ( cross line ) with MetroY Pro , MetroY standard can do exactly the same .
The size of the old French 5 Frank coin from 1949 is 30 mm slightly bigger than 2 Euro at 25.75 mm
The smallest object / relief that the unaided human eyes can see is about 0.1 mm , 0.04 mm is a size of a human egg. And 0.02mm the size of a white blood cell . Just a reminder that 3D scanner is not a microscope 
Here more from MetroY Pro , just look at the lips and neck skin details .
2 Likes
That’s great, but in the lower left corner it says that the face was obtained on a turntable, and not by the laser scanning method.
1 Like
The potential of the scanner and it’s sensors is important no matter what mode you are using . Unless you are interested only in MetroY standard .
Auto mode is most detailed because is more precise than handheld scanning and can capture 8 millions points per sec , compared to 1 million and 800K per second using Laser mode.
Anything better will cost you at least $20K so not bad at all.
1 Like
thanks, it’s pretty good for a budget SLS. but I’m still interested in the laser mode, the coin already looks promising, I hope to wait for the comparison
1 Like
If anything, I would be interested in seeing the details of a suitable or matted object or face in full field mode, a stationary scanner is the least of my interests.
1 Like
this is a screenshot of another comparison review, which gave me the idea of different details. I would like to understand if this is an incorrectly captured data or a technology difference. as far as I know, the competitor uses different focal lengths in different laser modes (but I doubt that the optics have a variable focus); therefore, I would like to see detail tests in different zones (distances), not only in green.